Back to Blog

Reading Pugongying Audience Profiles: From Follower Counts to Real Due Diligence

Rnote API Team · · 110 views · 中文
Xiaohongshu Data Pugongying API Fan Profile Creator Selection

Judging a creator by follower count alone is the easiest way to waste a campaign budget. A 100k account can have 80% of its audience outside your target cities, or a dominant age band a full generation away from your buyers. The Pugongying (Dandelion) data endpoints expose the platform's own audience profile — here is how to read those fields.

Four endpoints, four questions

Endpoint What it answers
POST /api/v2/pgy/blogger/fans-summary Total followers and recent net growth — scale and direction
POST /api/v2/pgy/blogger/fans-profile Gender, age, city and interest distribution
POST /api/v2/pgy/blogger/fans-history The growth curve — is it steady?
POST /api/v2/pgy/blogger/notes-rate Median note performance, engagement rate, completion rate

The profile tells you who the audience is; note performance tells you whether those people actually watch. You need both — profile alone will hand you accounts with the right audience and no reach.

Reading the profile

City distribution. What matters is the concentration across the top N cities, not whether your target city appears. "Beijing 12%" means something very different when second place is 3% (genuine regional concentration) versus when places 2–5 all sit near 10% (that's just the platform baseline, and says nothing about this account).

Age distribution. Check whether the dominant band overlaps your buyers or merely covers them. A baby-care brand wants 25–34 dominant — not 18–24 at 40% with 25–34 at 30%, where your band is diluted by a younger pool.

Gender split. Be wary of extremes. Above 95% single-gender, combined with a sudden follower jump, often signals bought growth or a very narrow content mix. Cross-check the curve with fans-history.

Due diligence via the growth curve

fans-history is the most revealing of the four. Healthy growth looks like a series of small steps: a bump when a note lands, then a gentle slope. Two shapes deserve a second look:

  • Vertical jumps — dozens of times the usual daily gain over one or two days, then straight back to flat.
  • Sawtooth — gains and losses cancelling out, net growth near zero.

Neither is automatically disqualifying, but both are worth one more question: what got published then? Pull the notes from that window with POST /api/v2/pgy/blogger/notes. If there is no matching hit, price the risk in.

A screening order that works

  1. blogger/list — build a candidate pool by category and follower band.
  2. fans-profile — hard-filter on city and age. This step usually removes most of the pool.
  3. notes-rate — drop the "right audience, no reach" accounts on engagement rate.
  4. fans-history — due-diligence the survivors on growth shape.
  5. blogger/detail — pull collaboration rates and compute cost per effective reach.

Filtering before pulling rates cuts your call volume noticeably. The rates endpoint is the last step, not a screening tool.

Get started

Sign up free and call the Pugongying endpoints directly — only successful calls are billed. Fields and pagination are in the docs. For the wider workflow, see influencer selection with the Pugongying API.

Related articles

About the Rnote Xiaohongshu API

Skip building a RedNote scraper: one API key gets you notes, comments, users, search, products and Pugongying creator data. Pay per call, charged only for successful requests.